Only possible implications of sexual nature were "in milk" which it clearly found sexual, and "swimming" and only because it implies lots of skin showing. Never asked for a bikini or other revealing concept on a human. Never asked for nudity, nakedness, sexuality, or anything like that. Suspension says for violating content policy - I never asked a single time for anything explicitly sexual. I got suspended for the prompt "full bodied man" after "full bodied woman" was blocked. Refused any prompt with the word "bikini" (even for "on a statue") or "full body visible" (even if clothed) Interesting datapoints: it will block some sexually suggestive prompts regarding women (a woman swimming in milk) but not for men (a man swimming in milk)Ĭhanging milk to "almond milk" got the prompt accepted but then blocked before showing image It's fun to try to find flaws in content blocking. I'm not going to make any statements about replacing artists, I am just going to reflect on what a wild few months it's been in AI development. I did not tune the prompt, I didn't even account for the resulting description being the wrong kind of format or that it got cut off at the end. I then fed this directly into another tool that gave these images as a result. Then told it to pick one it liked, and expand on it to five pieces with descriptions (I gave it a very short explanation about how to prompt an AI art generator). I asked a machine to brainstorm some ideas for a theme for an art show. Now, you might say this is a bland or uninspired take, but I want you to step back a moment if you're thinking that. SD didn't really capture it very well IMO, this does. I asked GPT a while back to pick a theme to explore in 5 art pieces, it picked mental health and one it decided it liked was "the weight of anxiety".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |